The dream of an international Women's Security Council
The women's action Scheherazade proposes a global Think Tank

Ute Scheub

There was once a bloodthirsty sultan, who spent every night with a different woman. These women were then killed the following day, on his instruction. Scheherazade however, approached him and told him a thousand and one stories for a thousand and one nights. In this way she saved herself and all the women of her country.

Dialogue instead of Violence
This is the legend on which the women's action group Scheherazade (1) which was founded in 1991 in Germany out of protest against the Gulf War is based. The manifesto entitled "World vote against war", was signed by about 50.000 women from all continents of the earth and handed over to the UN secretariat General. In 1992, on the invitation of the Moroccan sociologist Fatima Mernissi in Rabat, the Scheherazade women discussed the idea of an International Women's Security Council with Algerian, Tunisian and Moroccan writers. Many were in favour of such a council, however at that time, no one had the energy, the time or the finances to undertake such a project.

After 11 September 2001
the women's action group Scheherazade was re-founded in Berlin out of protest against the bombardment of Afghanistan. Unlike ten years ago we are now convinced that the international stage has subsequently become available for an International Women's Security Council.

The international committees (including the United Nations Security Council), dominated by the super powers prove to be incapable of guaranteeing the safety of all inhabitants of the earth. Instead they produce intolerable double standards with the enforcement of international law and human rights. According to them, the life of white people from northern industrial countries is considerably more valuable than the life of people from southern countries. Today modern wars are carried out in the South and East with weapons obtained from the North and West, and 90 percent of their victims are civilians - especially women, children and the elderly. Furthermore in practically all wars, women are tormented by sexual violence.

It was not only since 11 September 2001 that expenditure on armaments and weapons increased again worldwide. In the world, every second almost 30.000 dollars are wasted on armaments, whilst at the same time, one person dies every second from starvation. The USA in this respect is by far the largest producer of weapons. As a result of the terror attacks, the Bush administration wants to increase military expenditure by 2007 to the unimaginable sum of 2,1 Billion US dollars in total. A small portion thereof should suffice to ensure that each person on this earth leads a decent life with sufficient nourishment, drinking water, healthcare and education.

A visible sign of rebellion against the order of violence -
that's what the International Women's Security Council would be. It would be a feminine counterweight to international councils that are almost entirely occupied by men, namely statesmen, senior army officers and diplomats. Women understand considerably more about civil conflict resolution than men do - not because they are better people or because they would be more peaceful, but because their social role has predestined them for the purpose. All over the world women's initiatives and human rights groups predominantly comprise of women: the Palestinian-Israeli Women in Black, the Afghan RAWA women, the women's initiatives around Africa's Great lakes, the Northern-Irish women for peace, the Russian Mothers of Soldiers, the Argentinean Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo … This enormous potential should be used, concentrated and given a clearly audible voice.

The speakers of the International Women's Security Council should be well-known writers, renowned female scientists and committed activists, whose integrity and authority would not be subjected to any doubt and which they would vouch for with their independent thinking and courageous actions. This is the only way in which it can function from the beginning as the mouthpiece for all those who would otherwise not have a chance to be heard by the media.

Famous personalities alone however, do not suffice. An International Women's Security Council can only function if it networks with existing women's initiatives and NGOs and becomes a global Think Tank for civil conflict resolutions. In close co-operation with female experts from the current crisis regions the council should develop conflict resolution strategies and propagate them on all levels. And it should exercise its veto if decisions of the United Nations Security Council or other international councils clash with the spirit of peace and international understanding.

The UN Councils however produce the best decisions on paper….
Resolution 1325 of the UN Security Council for example demands the inclusion of women on all levels of peace processes 2). In actual fact however, these decisions are hardly put into practice anywhere - neither by the UNO, which has been crippled financially because its main donors are saving their money, nor by the affected nations. In Afghanistan, for example, women continue to be kept away in a scandalous manner from the process of nation building, even though the country was exclusively destroyed by men, causing war and gender apartheid.

To wait for the UN to establish an International Women's Security Council themselves would mean waiting until the 22nd century. Such a Council could only arise with in an international "non-parliamentarian" process of democratic discussions. Scheherazade therefore proposes the International Women's Security Council to be created as a trans-national NGO as soon as enough international support has been secured.
Whether the UNO will recognize the International Women's Security Council, perhaps as its seventh council is not an issue. In the meantime, it is more important not to have to consider any UN conventions and not the diplomatic discourse.

The International Women's Security Council must be used as a free space and a workshop for the future, in which finally utopias can be developed again: for example a worldwide Marshall Plan for peace and gender justice; another form of "Tobin Tax" or even "perversion tax" for arms' exports; the appeal for female conversion and disarmament ministers in all governments, the legal anchorage of the principle in international law that the party responsible is liable for the damages. In the case of Afghanistan this would mean that the unscrupulous business men who flooded the land with about 10 million mines and a further 10 million small weapons, would be forced to gather up their products of death and to pay an appropriate compensation sum.

Naturally there is also criticism from women's circles….
Some for example have commented that the founding of an independent Women's Security Council would be a return to gender division. It would make more sense to demand a quota of the entire UNO including the enforced peace troops. Our reply to this is that it is not an issue of gender division. The international Women's Security Council should be totally open to all men, who prescribe to its aims, however the council of speakers should remain female. The demand for steadfast quotas is easier to enforce by means of political pressure from the outside than within the UNO, which neither offers positions, nor programmed freedom for women. The UN Security Council, which almost totally comprises of men, would be quoted in a practical manner by the founding of an International Women's Security Council. Many committed female activists for women's and human rights have commented that they are positive and almost thrilled with the Scheherazade idea 3) whereby the opinion was represented from many sides, that it would be a great political advantage if such a Council were to be founded not on US- but on European territory.
There was once a small women's group, that told the fairytale of a Woman's UN Security Council for a thousand and one days. If the bad sultan has not destroyed them then, the council will most probably be founded after 11 September 2003.

Ute Scheub Is a freelance journalist, who lives in Berlin (Germany) and is active for Scheherzade.

1) (www.sheherazade.org).
2) More detail under www.peacewomen.org, here it is possible to subscribe to an Email-service "1325-news").
3) Representatives of the Working Group on Women and International Peace and Security (www.globalpolicy.org/security/ngokgrp/index.htm) support the founding of an International Woman's Security Council. This working group, which after much effort was able to implement the passing of "Women's" Resolution 1325 in the UN Security Council, is a merger of the following women's and human rights organisations: International Alert (www.international-alert.org), Hague Appeal for Peace (www.haguepeace.org), Amnesty International (www.amnesty.org ), Women´s Caucus for Gender Justice (www.iwtc.org), Women´s Commission for Refugee and Women and Children (www.womenscommission.org) and Women´s International League for Peace and Freedom (www.wilpf.org). Also the trans-European Organisation Women in Europe for a Common Future (www.wecf.org) demanded at their European Women´s Conference for a Sustainable Future in March 2002 in the Czech Republic the creation of an International Women's Security Council.
Scheherazade activist Halina Bendkowski, after several weeks spent probing in New York, received the promise from well-known activists, to commit themselves to the idea of an International Women's Security Council. Those that are interested in the project for an International Women's Security Council include amongst others Charlotte Bunch, founder and director of the Centre for Women´s Global Leadership (www.cwgl.rutgers.edu), Alisa Salomon, specialist of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Azza Karam, programme director of the World Conference on Religion and Peace (www.wcrp.org), Hibaaq O. Basbas, Chairlady of the Centre for the Strategic Initiatives of Women (www.csiw.org), Felicity Hill of UNIFEM (www.unifem.undp.org), Pam Spees, programme director of the Women´s Caucus for Gender Justice (www.iccwomen.org) and Chris Cuomoco-organiser of the anti-war coalition New Yorkers say No to War (www.nysaynotowar.org) .

Translated from German by Heathor Beachalor

Lol@ 3        email